AKASH AND 3 OTHERS vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NA528/9510/2026
Case under Andhra State Act Section 498-A,43-498-A. Disposed: -- on 25th March 2026.
CNR: UPHC011257312026
Filing Number
NA528/
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
NA528/9510/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Judge
Nand Prabha Shukla
Coram
Nand Prabha Shukla
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of charge sheet ( 27 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 27-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AKASH AND 3 OTHERS
Adv. DIPENDRA KUMAR,MRITUNJAY RAI,MRITUNJAY RAI, ,PRADEEP KUMAR RAI,MRITUNJAY RAI
-
2.DINESH TYAGI
Adv. MRITUNJAY RAI PRADEEP KUMAR RAI
-
3.REKHA
Adv. MRITUNJAY RAI PRADEEP KUMAR RAI
-
4.SHILPI
Adv. MRITUNJAY RAI PRADEEP KUMAR RAI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.
-
2.PRIYANKA TYAGI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Nand Prabha ShuklaView PDF
The Allahabad High Court quashed criminal proceedings against Akash and others in a matrimonial dispute case involving charges under IPC Sections 498A, 323 and the Dowry Prohibition Act, finding the case suitable for quashing based on a settlement agreement dated 19.03.2025 verified by the lower court. The court held that matrimonial disputes with genuine settlements warrant quashing to promote amicable resolution and serve justice, even for non-compoundable offences, citing Supreme Court precedent that such cases have predominantly civil character warranting exercise of inherent jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
—
Tej Pratap Tiwari
-
18-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. NA528/9510/2026
The Allahabad High Court quashed criminal proceedings against Akash and others in a matrimonial dispute case involving charges under IPC Sections 498A, 323 and the Dowry Prohibition Act, finding the case suitable for quashing based on a settlement agreement dated 19.03.2025 verified by the lower court. The court held that matrimonial disputes with genuine settlements warrant quashing to promote amicable resolution and serve justice, even for non-compoundable offences, citing Supreme Court precedent that such cases have predominantly civil character warranting exercise of inherent jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts