BHANMATI vs STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A., ,RAM KESH,AMITYA SINGH,MAHENDRA PRATAP YADAV — NABAIL/2210/2026

Disposed: -- on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 10-Apr-2026

CNR: UPHC011255442026

Filing Number

NABAIL/

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

NABAIL/2210/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Judge

Avnish Saxena

Coram

Avnish Saxena

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

ABAIL MINOR ( 64 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHANMATI

    Adv. YOGENDRA GUPTA,DHIRAJ KUMAR UPADHYAY,DHIRAJ KUMAR UPADHYAY, ,DHIRAJ KUMAR UPADHYAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A., ,RAM KESH,AMITYA SINGH,MAHENDRA PRATAP YADAV

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Dr. Gautam Chowdhary

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Dr. Gautam ChowdharyView PDF

    The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Court No. 71, Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary, J.) heard Bhanmati's anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS against the State of U.P. on April 10, 2026. The court adjourned the matter to April 17, 2026 for further hearing, with both counsel for the applicant and opposite parties present. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Dr. Gautam Chowdhary

  5. 03-Apr-2026

    Dr. Gautam ChowdharyView PDF

  6. 03-Apr-2026

    Ashutosh Srivastava

  7. 28-Mar-2026

    Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar (Judicial)

  8. 20-Mar-2026

    Krishan Pahal

  9. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NABAIL/2210/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Court No. 71, Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary, J.) heard Bhanmati's anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS against the State of U.P. on April 10, 2026. The court adjourned the matter to April 17, 2026 for further hearing, with both counsel for the applicant and opposite parties present. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case