SOM NATH GAUTAM vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ATUL SRIVASTAVA — NA528/11103/2026
Case under Andhra State Act Section 411,43-411. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
CNR: UPHC011252372026
Filing Number
NA528/
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
NA528/11103/2026
Registration Date
17-Mar-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous under the Head of Crl. Misc. Applications ( 90 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Last updated 23-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SOM NATH GAUTAM
Adv. TINKU SINGH,VIJAY SINGH GOUR,VIJAY SINGH GOUR, ,VIJAY SINGH GOUR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ATUL SRIVASTAVA
-
2.UMAKANT YADAV
Adv. ATUL SRIVASTAVA
Case History
-
02-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
02-Jul-2026
—
Vivek Kumar Singh
-
27-Apr-2026
Vivek Kumar SinghView PDF
Case Summary: NA528/11103/2026 Som Nath Gautam challenged the trial court's order compelling him to provide a blood sample, arguing forced DNA collection violates his rights. The High Court of Allahabad adjourned the case without granting interim relief, allowing both parties two weeks to file counter and rejoinder affidavits. The case was listed for hearing on 02.07.2026, with the court clarifying no interim order was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Apr-2026
—
Chawan Prakash
-
10-Apr-2026
Chawan PrakashView PDF
-
10-Apr-2026
—
Vivek Kumar Singh
-
03-Apr-2026
—
Avnish Saxena
-
27-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Mar-2026
Avnish SaxenaView PDF
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. NA528/11103/2026
Case Summary: NA528/11103/2026 Som Nath Gautam challenged the trial court's order compelling him to provide a blood sample, arguing forced DNA collection violates his rights. The High Court of Allahabad adjourned the case without granting interim relief, allowing both parties two weeks to file counter and rejoinder affidavits. The case was listed for hearing on 02.07.2026, with the court clarifying no interim order was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts