BALBEER vs UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER — WRIC/8978/2026
Disposed: -- on 19th March 2026.
CNR: UPHC011237622026
Filing Number
WRIC/
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
WRIC/8978/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Judge
Sudhanshu Chauhan , Saral Srivastava
Coram
Sudhanshu Chauhan , Saral Srivastava
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
WRIT PETITION RELATING TO PUBLIC SECTOR UNDERTAKINGS ( 222900 )
Sub-Category
MISCELLANEOUS ( 90 )
Judicial Branch
Civil WRITS
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BALBEER
Adv. MADHUSUDAN DIKSHIT
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER
Adv. ,GAURAV KUMAR CHAND,ANAND TIWARI,A.S.G.I. 1123
-
2.INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD.
Adv. A.S.G.I. ANAND TIWARI GAURAV KUMAR CHAND
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
Sudhanshu Chauhan,saral SrivastavaView PDF
Case Summary: WRIC 8978/2026 - Balbeer v. Union of India & Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. The Allahabad High Court disposed of petitioner Balbeer's writ petition seeking to quash an order dated 08.01.2026 and restrain demolition of his house in Saharanpur. The court found no grounds for intervention after the Indian Oil Corporation's counsel assured that any further action regarding the alleged encroachment would strictly comply with Section 9(3) of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962, requiring prior application before the District Judge rather than unilateral demolition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
As Fresh
Sudhanshu Chauhan , Saral Srivastava
-
18-Mar-2026
Sudhanshu Chauhan,saral SrivastavaView PDF
-
18-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WRIC/8978/2026
Case Summary: WRIC 8978/2026 - Balbeer v. Union of India & Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. The Allahabad High Court disposed of petitioner Balbeer's writ petition seeking to quash an order dated 08.01.2026 and restrain demolition of his house in Saharanpur. The court found no grounds for intervention after the Indian Oil Corporation's counsel assured that any further action regarding the alleged encroachment would strictly comply with Section 9(3) of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962, requiring prior application before the District Judge rather than unilateral demolition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts