ALOK PANDEY vs STATE OF UP AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,ARVIND PRABODH DUBEY — NA528/8966/2026
Case under Andhra State Act Section 506,43-506. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
CNR: UPHC011218992026
Filing Number
NA528/
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
NA528/8966/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of criminal Proceedings in State case ( 36 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ALOK PANDEY
Adv. KANDARP NARAYAN MISHRA,SANDEEP KUMAR RAI,SANDEEP KUMAR RAI, ,SANDEEP KUMAR RAI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UP AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,ARVIND PRABODH DUBEY
-
2.MANVENDRA NATH TIWARI
Adv. ARVIND PRABODH DUBEY
Case History
-
01-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
01-Jun-2026
—
Saurabh Srivastava
-
22-May-2026
—
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
-
20-Mar-2026
Sanjay Kumar PachoriView PDF
Case Summary: NA528/8966/2026 Alok Pandey filed a petition under Section 528 BNSS to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 14267 of 2025) arising from an FIR dated 24.8.2024 for alleged offences under IPC Sections 406, 420, 504, 506. Pandey contended the allegations were false, frivolous, and constituted a civil dispute wrongfully converted into a criminal case. The court found the matter prima facie requires consideration and granted interim relief: proceedings against the applicant remain stayed; opposite parties have three weeks to file counter-affidavits; case listed after eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Mar-2026
—
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. NA528/8966/2026
Case Summary: NA528/8966/2026 Alok Pandey filed a petition under Section 528 BNSS to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 14267 of 2025) arising from an FIR dated 24.8.2024 for alleged offences under IPC Sections 406, 420, 504, 506. Pandey contended the allegations were false, frivolous, and constituted a civil dispute wrongfully converted into a criminal case. The court found the matter prima facie requires consideration and granted interim relief: proceedings against the applicant remain stayed; opposite parties have three weeks to file counter-affidavits; case listed after eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts