NISHA NOW MAJOR vs STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., MAN BAHADUR SINGH — NC413/142/2026
Case under Andhra State Act Section 504,43-504. Next hearing: 29th July 2026.
CNR: UPHC011209022026
Filing Number
NC413/
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
NC413/142/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL APPEAL U/s 372 Cr.P.C. ( 400800 )
Sub-Category
Criminal Appeal U/s 372 Cr.P.C. (Single Bench) ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Crl. Appeals
Last updated 23-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NISHA NOW MAJOR
Adv. BABHRU VAHAN SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., MAN BAHADUR SINGH
-
2.HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
Adv. MAN BAHADUR SINGH
-
3.CHILD WELFARE COMMITTEE
Adv. MAN BAHADUR SINGH
-
4.DHIRENDRA @ MONU
Adv. MAN BAHADUR SINGH
-
5.MANIL @ MUNIL MISHRA
Adv. MAN BAHADUR SINGH
-
6.SACHCHIDANAND
Adv. MAN BAHADUR SINGH
-
7.SWAMINATH
Adv. MAN BAHADUR SINGH
Case History
-
29-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-Jul-2026
As Fresh
Santosh Rai
-
13-May-2026
Santosh RaiView PDF
In Criminal Appeal No. 142 of 2026, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad adjourned the case to the last week of July 2026. The counsel for respondents 4-7 sought adjournment to prepare their case, which was granted by Justice Santosh Rai. The matter was listed amongst the top ten cases with Sri Man Bahadur Singh noted as counsel for respondents 4-7. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-May-2026
—
Santosh Rai
-
09-Apr-2026
Santosh RaiView PDF
-
09-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Jai Prakash TiwariView PDF
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. NC413/142/2026
In Criminal Appeal No. 142 of 2026, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad adjourned the case to the last week of July 2026. The counsel for respondents 4-7 sought adjournment to prepare their case, which was granted by Justice Santosh Rai. The matter was listed amongst the top ten cases with Sri Man Bahadur Singh noted as counsel for respondents 4-7. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts