KARAN vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME Advocate - G.A. — BAIL/7351/2026
Disposed: -- on 19th March 2026.
CNR: UPHC011202752026
Filing Number
BAIL/
Filing Date
20-Feb-2026
Registration No
BAIL/7351/2026
Registration Date
23-Feb-2026
Judge
Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal
Coram
Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 439 Cr.P.C. for bail (minor) ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KARAN
Adv. JAI PRAKASH SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME Advocate - G.A.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
Arun Kumar Singh DeshwalView PDF
The High Court at Allahabad granted bail to Karan in a theft case (Crime No. 49 of 2025) under BNS Sections 331(4), 305, 317(2), finding that he was falsely implicated based solely on recovery of a yellow metal pendant that was never identified by the complainant, and that the charge sheet had already been filed eliminating need for custodial interrogation. The court imposed standard bail conditions including non-tampering with evidence, cooperation in trial, and abstention from criminal activity, with bail cancellation as penalty for breach. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
—
Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BAIL/7351/2026
The High Court at Allahabad granted bail to Karan in a theft case (Crime No. 49 of 2025) under BNS Sections 331(4), 305, 317(2), finding that he was falsely implicated based solely on recovery of a yellow metal pendant that was never identified by the complainant, and that the charge sheet had already been filed eliminating need for custodial interrogation. The court imposed standard bail conditions including non-tampering with evidence, cooperation in trial, and abstention from criminal activity, with bail cancellation as penalty for breach. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts