RAJA vs STATE OF U.P AND 9 OTHERS — WRIC/8157/2026

Disposed: -- on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC011197342026

Filing Number

WRIC/

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

WRIC/8157/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Judge

Prakash Padia

Coram

Prakash Padia

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Writs relating to Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code 2006 and Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code Rules 2016 ( 110400 )

Sub-Category

( 90 )

Judicial Branch

Civil WRITS

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJA

    Adv. YOGESH KUMAR SINGH,ROHIT PANDEY,ROHIT PANDEY, ,ROHIT PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P AND 9 OTHERS

    Adv. ,C.S.C. 1123

  2. 2.SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, PHOOLPUR, AZAMGARH

    Adv. C.S.C.

  3. 3.TEHSILDAR, PHOOLPUR

    Adv. C.S.C.

  4. 4.MEERA DEVI

    Adv. C.S.C.

  5. 5.SITAPATTI

    Adv. C.S.C.

  6. 6.KANHAIYA

    Adv. C.S.C.

  7. 7.RAMJI

    Adv. C.S.C.

  8. 8.RAMDEEN

    Adv. C.S.C.

  9. 9.USHA DEVI

    Adv. C.S.C.

  10. 10.DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, AZAMGARH, DIVISION

    Adv. C.S.C.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    Prakash PadiaView PDF

    The High Court dismissed Raja's writ petition challenging a Tehsildar's order dated 27.01.2026 passed under Sections 34/35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The court held the petition unmaintainable as an alternative statutory remedy was available to the petitioner—an appeal before the Sub Divisional Officer under Section 35(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Fresh

    Prakash Padia

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WRIC/8157/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court dismissed Raja's writ petition challenging a Tehsildar's order dated 27.01.2026 passed under Sections 34/35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The court held the petition unmaintainable as an alternative statutory remedy was available to the petitioner—an appeal before the Sub Divisional Officer under Section 35(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case