GAURI SHANKAR VERMA AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NA528/8610/2026
Next hearing: 22nd May 2026.
CNR: UPHC011193202026
Filing Number
NA528/
Filing Date
21-Feb-2026
Registration No
NA528/8610/2026
Registration Date
23-Feb-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of charge sheet ( 27 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GAURI SHANKAR VERMA AND ANOTHER
Adv. BRIJ RAJ SINGH,DHARMENDRA PRASAD,DHARMENDRA PRASAD, ,SURYAKANT VERMA,PRABHAKAR VARDHAN,MOHAMMAD JAVED,DHARMENDRA PRASAD
-
2.ADITYA
Adv. DHARMENDRA PRASAD MOHAMMAD JAVED PRABHAKAR VARDHAN SURYAKANT VERMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.
-
2.KRISHNA PAL CHAND
Case History
-
22-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
02-Jul-2026
—
Chawan Prakash
-
22-May-2026
—
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
-
24-Apr-2026
—
Padam Narain Mishra
-
17-Apr-2026
—
Samit Gopal
-
19-Mar-2026
Sanjay Kumar PachoriView PDF
Summary of Case NA528/8610/2026 The Allahabad High Court admitted an application by Gauri Shankar Verma and another to quash criminal proceedings under Section 317(2) B.N.S. filed at Gorakhpur. The court found prima facie merit in their contention that the FIR was based on false allegations with ulterior motive, lacking sufficient pre-summoning evidence against the applicants. The court stayed further proceedings against the applicants, directed the state to file counter-affidavits within two weeks, and listed the case after eight weeks for further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
—
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. NA528/8610/2026
Summary of Case NA528/8610/2026 The Allahabad High Court admitted an application by Gauri Shankar Verma and another to quash criminal proceedings under Section 317(2) B.N.S. filed at Gorakhpur. The court found prima facie merit in their contention that the FIR was based on false allegations with ulterior motive, lacking sufficient pre-summoning evidence against the applicants. The court stayed further proceedings against the applicants, directed the state to file counter-affidavits within two weeks, and listed the case after eight weeks for further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts