FIROZ AHMAD vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A. — NA529/968/2026
Case under Andhra State Act Section 326,43-326. Next hearing: 22nd September 2026.
CNR: UPHC011190832026
Filing Number
NA529/
Filing Date
21-Feb-2026
Registration No
NA529/968/2026
Registration Date
26-Feb-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION U/S 483 Cr.P.C. ( 401600 )
Sub-Category
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION U/S 483 Cr.P.C. ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.FIROZ AHMAD
Adv. SHIVAM PANDEY,SURYAPRAKASH SHARMA,SURYAPRAKASH SHARMA, ,VIPIN KUMAR TRIPATHI,SURYAPRAKASH SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A.
-
2.PARAS NATH
-
3.MANTORA DEVI
-
4.REETA DEVI
Case History
-
22-Sep-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-Sep-2026
—
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
-
17-Mar-2026
Shekhar Kumar YadavView PDF
The High Court of Allahabad directed the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate to expeditiously decide Criminal Case No. 665 of 2001 (pending since 2000 with only one witness examined) within six months without unnecessary adjournments. The court warned that if the case remains undecided within this period, the lower court must appear in person to explain the delay. The case is listed for review after six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. NA529/968/2026
The High Court of Allahabad directed the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate to expeditiously decide Criminal Case No. 665 of 2001 (pending since 2000 with only one witness examined) within six months without unnecessary adjournments. The court warned that if the case remains undecided within this period, the lower court must appear in person to explain the delay. The case is listed for review after six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts