AREA MANAGER, FUTURE GENERALI INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. vs SMT. ANTIMA RAWAT AND 4 OTHERS — FAFO/751/2026

Next hearing: 25th March 2026.

Next hearing 25-Mar-2026

CNR: UPHC011182892026

Filing Number

FAFOD/

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

FAFO/751/2026

Registration Date

22-Feb-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER ( 302100 )

Sub-Category

U/s 30 of the Workmen s Compensation Act 1923 ( 29 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Appeal

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AREA MANAGER, FUTURE GENERALI INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.

    Adv. PAWAN KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. ANTIMA RAWAT AND 4 OTHERS

    Adv. ,J.P. SINGH,BHARAT PRATAP SINGH 1123

  2. 2.SANVI

    Adv. BHARAT PRATAP SINGH J.P. SINGH

  3. 3.PARAM

    Adv. BHARAT PRATAP SINGH J.P. SINGH

  4. 4.SMT. NIRMALA DEVI

    Adv. BHARAT PRATAP SINGH J.P. SINGH

  5. 5.MUNIB SINGH

    Adv. BHARAT PRATAP SINGH J.P. SINGH

Case History

  1. 25-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    —

    Piyush Agrawal

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    —

    Piyush Agrawal

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Piyush Agrawal

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Piyush AgrawalView PDF

    The Allahabad High Court admitted Future Generali India Insurance Company's appeal on substantial questions of law against the Employees' Compensation Commissioner's award dated 23.12.2025. The court stayed the impugned award's operation while allowing claimant-respondents to withdraw 50% of the appellant's deposited amount, with the remaining 50% to be invested in a fixed-term deposit scheme pending appeal disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. FAFO/751/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Allahabad High Court admitted Future Generali India Insurance Company's appeal on substantial questions of law against the Employees' Compensation Commissioner's award dated 23.12.2025. The court stayed the impugned award's operation while allowing claimant-respondents to withdraw 50% of the appellant's deposited amount, with the remaining 50% to be invested in a fixed-term deposit scheme pending appeal disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case