RAHUL vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NABAIL/2016/2026

Case under Andhra State Act Section 406,43-406. Disposed: -- on 30th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC011169102026

Filing Number

NABAIL/

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

NABAIL/2016/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Judge

Rajiv Lochan Shukla

Coram

Rajiv Lochan Shukla

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

ABAIL MINOR ( 64 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

30-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 406,43-406

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAHUL

    Adv. SUNIL KUMAR PANDEY,AJIT NARAIN MISHRA,AJIT NARAIN MISHRA, ,AJIT NARAIN MISHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.SURESH CHANDRA GANGWAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    —

    Rajiv Lochan Shukla

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    —

    Avnish Saxena

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    —

    Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar (Judicial)

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar (Judicial)View PDF

    The Allahabad High Court granted interim anticipatory bail to Rahul in a fraud case (Crime No. 103/2025) involving charges under IPC sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 323, 504, 506. The court found Rahul was a marginal witness to a property sale agreement rather than a principal beneficiary, and granted bail on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties, valid until April 16, 2026, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence, court appearance, and cooperation during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    —

    Sameer Jain

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NABAIL/2016/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Allahabad High Court granted interim anticipatory bail to Rahul in a fraud case (Crime No. 103/2025) involving charges under IPC sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 323, 504, 506. The court found Rahul was a marginal witness to a property sale agreement rather than a principal beneficiary, and granted bail on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties, valid until April 16, 2026, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence, court appearance, and cooperation during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case