RAM BHAROSHEY DUBEY vs STATE OF UP AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NA528/9159/2026

Case under Andhra State Act Section 504,43-504. Next hearing: 26th May 2026.

Next hearing 26-May-2026

CNR: UPHC011162732026

Filing Number

NA528/

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

NA528/9159/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of charge sheet ( 27 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 504,43-504

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAM BHAROSHEY DUBEY

    Adv. RAVIKANT SHUKLA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UP AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA

Case History

  1. 26-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 26-May-2026

    —

    Saurabh Srivastava

  3. 19-May-2026

    —

    Sanjay Kumar Pachori

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Sanjay Kumar PachoriView PDF

    Summary of Case NA528/9159/2026: Ram Bharoshey Dubey filed a petition under Section 528 BNSS to quash criminal proceedings arising from a land dispute involving property demarcation. The court found the matter prima facie requires consideration and granted a stay on further proceedings against the applicant. The court issued notice to the second respondent, directed both parties to file affidavits within prescribed timelines, and adjourned the case for eight weeks for substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NA528/9159/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case NA528/9159/2026: Ram Bharoshey Dubey filed a petition under Section 528 BNSS to quash criminal proceedings arising from a land dispute involving property demarcation. The court found the matter prima facie requires consideration and granted a stay on further proceedings against the applicant. The court issued notice to the second respondent, directed both parties to file affidavits within prescribed timelines, and adjourned the case for eight weeks for substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case