DIVYANSHU TRIPATHI vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,MOHD. SHAMIM,GAUTAM — NA528/8238/2026

Case under Civil Defence Act Section 138,216-138. Next hearing: 26th May 2026.

Next hearing 26-May-2026

CNR: UPHC011143932026

Filing Number

NA528/

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

NA528/8238/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/S 482 Cr.P.C. against order of Magistrate under section 138 of negotiable instruments Act 1881 ( 38 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Last updated 27-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Defence Act Section 138,216-138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DIVYANSHU TRIPATHI

    Adv. SUSHIL KUMAR DUBEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,MOHD. SHAMIM,GAUTAM

  2. 2.NEELENDRA PRATAP SINGH

    Adv. GAUTAM MOHD. SHAMIM

Case History

  1. 26-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 26-May-2026

    For Order

    Deepak Verma

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Deepak VermaView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad admitted Divyanshu Tripathi's application to quash a Section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act complaint, finding prima facie merit in his argument that he did not issue the dishonored cheque—it was issued by his late father Indrakant Tripathi and co-director Brajendra Kumar Singh. The court stayed further proceedings against the applicant pending final adjudication and directed notices to opposite parties, with a six-week deadline for counter-affidavits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Deepak VermaView PDF

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NA528/8238/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad admitted Divyanshu Tripathi's application to quash a Section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act complaint, finding prima facie merit in his argument that he did not issue the dishonored cheque—it was issued by his late father Indrakant Tripathi and co-director Brajendra Kumar Singh. The court stayed further proceedings against the applicant pending final adjudication and directed notices to opposite parties, with a six-week deadline for counter-affidavits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case