AVS HOSPITAL vs UNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS Advocate - ALOK KUMAR SINGH, ,VIVEK KUMAR SINGH — WRIC/7952/2026
Disposed: -- on 18th March 2026.
CNR: UPHC011130752026
Filing Number
WRIC/
Filing Date
19-Feb-2026
Registration No
WRIC/7952/2026
Registration Date
21-Feb-2026
Judge
Atul Sreedharan , Siddharth Nandan
Coram
Atul Sreedharan , Siddharth Nandan
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
ANY OTHER WRIT PETITION NOT MENTIONED IN THE CODE BOOK ( 390000 )
Judicial Branch
Civil WRITS
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AVS HOSPITAL
Adv. ABHAY MISHRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS Advocate - ALOK KUMAR SINGH, ,VIVEK KUMAR SINGH
-
2.NATIONAL HEALTH AUTHORITY (A GOVERNMENT OF INDIA SOCIETY)
Adv. VIVEK KUMAR SINGH
-
3.STATE OF U.P. THROUGH SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF MEDICAL HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE
Adv. VIVEK KUMAR SINGH
-
4.STATE AGENCY FOR COMPREHENSIVE AND INTEGRATED SERVICES
Adv. VIVEK KUMAR SINGH
-
5.STATE NODAL OFFICER
Adv. VIVEK KUMAR SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Siddharth Nandan,atul SreedharanView PDF
The Allahabad High Court quashed an email dated 13.06.2025 suspending AVS Hospital from the National Health Authority's empanelment scheme without providing a hearing or inquiry, finding the suspension was an ex-parte order lacking procedural fairness. Relying on precedent from an identical case, the court set aside the suspension and permitted the hospital to apply for payment dues for services rendered under the government health programme, directing respondents to decide such claims within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
—
Atul Sreedharan , Siddharth Nandan
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WRIC/7952/2026
The Allahabad High Court quashed an email dated 13.06.2025 suspending AVS Hospital from the National Health Authority's empanelment scheme without providing a hearing or inquiry, finding the suspension was an ex-parte order lacking procedural fairness. Relying on precedent from an identical case, the court set aside the suspension and permitted the hospital to apply for payment dues for services rendered under the government health programme, directing respondents to decide such claims within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts