VINOD @ VINOD KUMAR @ VINOD KUMAR GAUTAM vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NA528/8248/2026

Next hearing: 15th July 2026.

Next hearing 15-Jul-2026

CNR: UPHC011123752026

Filing Number

NA528/

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

NA528/8248/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of criminal Proceedings in State case ( 36 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Last updated 27-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VINOD @ VINOD KUMAR @ VINOD KUMAR GAUTAM

    Adv. PRABHAKAR PAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.SMT. SANGITA

Case History

  1. 15-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jul-2026

    Sanjiv Kumar

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Sanjiv KumarView PDF

    Case Summary: NA528/8248/2026 Applicant Vinod Kumar Gautam filed a Section 528 BNSS petition seeking to quash proceedings in a criminal case (Sections 308(5) and 61(2) BNS) where he was implicated based on a co-accused's confessional statement despite not being named in the original FIR and not being present at the crime scene. The High Court of Allahabad issued notice to the opposite party, stayed further proceedings against the applicant pending hearing, and scheduled the case for 15.07.2026 after affidavits are filed by all parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Sanjiv Kumar

  5. 23-Apr-2026

    Sanjiv Kumar

  6. 16-Apr-2026

    Jai Prakash Tiwari

  7. 08-Apr-2026

    Saurabh Srivastava

  8. 25-Mar-2026

    Saurabh SrivastavaView PDF

  9. 25-Mar-2026

    Sanjay Kumar Pachori

  10. 18-Mar-2026

    Sanjay Kumar Pachori

  11. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NA528/8248/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: NA528/8248/2026 Applicant Vinod Kumar Gautam filed a Section 528 BNSS petition seeking to quash proceedings in a criminal case (Sections 308(5) and 61(2) BNS) where he was implicated based on a co-accused's confessional statement despite not being named in the original FIR and not being present at the crime scene. The High Court of Allahabad issued notice to the opposite party, stayed further proceedings against the applicant pending hearing, and scheduled the case for 15.07.2026 after affidavits are filed by all parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case