SHASHIKANT RAI vs STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS — WPIL/499/2026
Disposed: -- on 07th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC011122942026
Filing Number
WPIL/
Filing Date
19-Feb-2026
Registration No
WPIL/499/2026
Registration Date
20-Feb-2026
Judge
Arun Bhansali , Kshitij Shailendra
Coram
Arun Bhansali , Kshitij Shailendra
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION ( 370000 )
Sub-Category
MISCELLANEOUS ( 90 )
Judicial Branch
Civil WRITS
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 23-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHASHIKANT RAI
Adv. SHIVENDRA NATH SINGH,SHITLESH PANDEY,SHITLESH PANDEY, ,SHITLESH PANDEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS
Adv. ,C.S.C. 1123
-
2.DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
Adv. C.S.C.
-
3.DISTRICT PANCHAYATIRAJ OFFICER
Adv. C.S.C.
-
4.DISTRICT ECONOMICS & STATISTICS OFFICER (D.E.S.O.)
Adv. C.S.C.
-
5.BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BLOCK KOPAGANJ
Adv. C.S.C.
-
6.REENA CHAUHAN
Adv. C.S.C.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Arun Bhansali,kshitij ShailendraView PDF
The High Court of Allahabad disposed of the PIL filed by Shashikant Rai, which sought directions to conclude an inquiry and take legal action against respondent no. 6 within a stipulated period. The court found that a detailed inspection report dated 26.09.2025 by the Finance and Statistical Officer, Mau, detected no wrongdoing and was accepted by the District Panchayat Raj Officer. Since the inquiry was completed and no wrongdoing was found, the court found no reason to continue the litigation and disposed of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
—
Arun Bhansali , Kshitij Shailendra
-
08-Apr-2026
Arun Bhansali,kshitij ShailendraView PDF
-
08-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2026
Arun Bhansali,kshitij ShailendraView PDF
-
19-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPIL/499/2026
The High Court of Allahabad disposed of the PIL filed by Shashikant Rai, which sought directions to conclude an inquiry and take legal action against respondent no. 6 within a stipulated period. The court found that a detailed inspection report dated 26.09.2025 by the Finance and Statistical Officer, Mau, detected no wrongdoing and was accepted by the District Panchayat Raj Officer. Since the inquiry was completed and no wrongdoing was found, the court found no reason to continue the litigation and disposed of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts