SHIVDHARI YADAV vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,RISHABH MISHRA,AKHILESH KUMAR MISHRA,Sr. Advocate — NABAIL/2021/2026

Case under Andhra State Act Section 504,43-504. Disposed: -- on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 18-Mar-2026

CNR: UPHC011120662026

Filing Number

NABAIL/

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

NABAIL/2021/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Judge

Rajiv Lochan Shukla

Coram

Rajiv Lochan Shukla

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

ABAIL MAJOR ( 65 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 504,43-504
Actquaries Act Section 3(2)(v),72-3(2)(v)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHIVDHARI YADAV

    Adv. SANJEEV KUMAR ASTHANA,PAVAN KUMAR PANDEY,PAVAN KUMAR PANDEY, ,PAVAN KUMAR PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,RISHABH MISHRA,AKHILESH KUMAR MISHRA,Sr. Advocate

  2. 2.DULARI DEVI

    Adv. Sr. Advocate AKHILESH KUMAR MISHRA RISHABH MISHRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    —

    Rajiv Lochan Shukla

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Rajiv Lochan ShuklaView PDF

    The Allahabad High Court adjourned Shivdhari Yadav's anticipatory bail application after the Government Advocate raised a preliminary objection that the case involves the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, under which anticipatory bail is statutorily barred by Section 18. The senior advocate for the applicant sought time to address this legal impediment, and the matter was postponed to March 23, 2026 for substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    —

    Rajiv Lochan Shukla

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NABAIL/2021/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Allahabad High Court adjourned Shivdhari Yadav's anticipatory bail application after the Government Advocate raised a preliminary objection that the case involves the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, under which anticipatory bail is statutorily barred by Section 18. The senior advocate for the applicant sought time to address this legal impediment, and the matter was postponed to March 23, 2026 for substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case