AFTAB AHAMAD vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NABAIL/2004/2026

Case under Andhra State Act Section 471,43-471. Disposed: -- on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC011103462026

Filing Number

NABAIL/

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

NABAIL/2004/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Judge

Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar (Judicial)

Coram

Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar (Judicial)

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

ABAIL MINOR ( 64 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 471,43-471

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AFTAB AHAMAD

    Adv. AJAY KUMAR SRIVASTAVA,ALKESHWAR KUMAR SINGH,ALKESHWAR KUMAR SINGH, ,ALKESHWAR KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.SHRI KUNWAR BRAHM PRAKASH SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar (Judicial)View PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad granted anticipatory bail to Aftab Ahamad, a contractual teacher at a Madrasa, in connection with embezzlement charges involving Rs. 1,86,000 in a case where the main role was assigned to co-accused Kalamuddin. The Court found the applicant's peripheral role and that co-accused had already been granted similar relief justified bail on personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with sureties, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence and cooperation during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    —

    Sameer Jain

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NABAIL/2004/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad granted anticipatory bail to Aftab Ahamad, a contractual teacher at a Madrasa, in connection with embezzlement charges involving Rs. 1,86,000 in a case where the main role was assigned to co-accused Kalamuddin. The Court found the applicant's peripheral role and that co-accused had already been granted similar relief justified bail on personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with sureties, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence and cooperation during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case