DEEPAK vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,GHAN SHYAM DUBEY — CRLRD/489/2026
Case under Advocates Act Section 125,10-125. Next hearing: 27th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC011089902026
Filing Number
CRLRD/
Filing Date
18-Feb-2026
Registration No
CRLRD/489/2026
Registration Date
26-Feb-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
REVISION ( 401300 )
Sub-Category
Against order for interim maintenance in any matter ( Not Provided elsewhere) ( 23 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Last updated 23-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DEEPAK
Adv. RAMESH CHANDRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,GHAN SHYAM DUBEY
-
2.SMT. RANI
Adv. GHAN SHYAM DUBEY
-
3.JOSHIT
Adv. GHAN SHYAM DUBEY
-
4.JIYANSH
Adv. GHAN SHYAM DUBEY
Case History
-
27-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-May-2026
—
Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar (J) (Criminal)
-
20-May-2026
—
Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar (J) (Criminal)
-
13-May-2026
—
Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar (J) (Criminal)
-
07-Apr-2026
Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar (J) (Criminal)View PDF
The High Court of Allahabad admitted Deepak's criminal revision petition (filed 320 days late) and issued notice to the opposite party to file a counter-affidavit within four weeks, with the revisionist to file a rejoinder within one week thereafter. The case was adjourned to May 13, 2026, and the court clarified that the revision's pendency does not prevent execution of maintenance orders or the wife's applications for modification under Section 127 Cr.P.C. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
—
Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar (J) (Criminal)
-
31-Mar-2026
—
Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar (J) (Criminal)
-
24-Mar-2026
—
Samit Gopal
-
17-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLRD/489/2026
The High Court of Allahabad admitted Deepak's criminal revision petition (filed 320 days late) and issued notice to the opposite party to file a counter-affidavit within four weeks, with the revisionist to file a rejoinder within one week thereafter. The case was adjourned to May 13, 2026, and the court clarified that the revision's pendency does not prevent execution of maintenance orders or the wife's applications for modification under Section 127 Cr.P.C. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts