VIPIN vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NA528/7670/2026

Case under Andhra State Act Section 506,43-506. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.

Next hearing 06-Jul-2026

CNR: UPHC011075332026

Filing Number

NA528/

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

NA528/7670/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of charge sheet ( 27 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 506,43-506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIPIN

    Adv. RAMESH KUMAR PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.SACHIN

Case History

  1. 06-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Jul-2026

    —

    Nand Prabha Shukla

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Nand Prabha ShuklaView PDF

    Case Summary: NA528/7670/2026 The Allahabad High Court referred Vipin's application under Section 528 BNSS (seeking to quash charges under Sections 498A, 323, 506 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act) to mediation with his wife/victim Renu. Vipin was directed to deposit Rs. 25,000 within four weeks (Rs. 20,000 to Renu as legal expense, Rs. 5,000 to the mediation centre). The court granted interim protection from coercive measures until the next hearing on 06.07.2026, when the mediation centre's report will be submitted. Protection lapses if payment isn't made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    —

    Nand Prabha Shukla

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    —

    Nand Prabha Shukla

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    —

    Tej Pratap Tiwari

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    —

    Tej Pratap Tiwari

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NA528/7670/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: NA528/7670/2026 The Allahabad High Court referred Vipin's application under Section 528 BNSS (seeking to quash charges under Sections 498A, 323, 506 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act) to mediation with his wife/victim Renu. Vipin was directed to deposit Rs. 25,000 within four weeks (Rs. 20,000 to Renu as legal expense, Rs. 5,000 to the mediation centre). The court granted interim protection from coercive measures until the next hearing on 06.07.2026, when the mediation centre's report will be submitted. Protection lapses if payment isn't made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case