DHARMO @ DHARMENDRA SHARMA vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,PANKAJ KUMAR TRIPATHI — NABAIL/1986/2026

Case under Andhra State Act Section 352,43-352. Disposed: -- on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC011071692026

Filing Number

NABAIL/

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

NABAIL/1986/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Judge

Rajiv Lochan Shukla

Coram

Rajiv Lochan Shukla

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

ABAIL MINOR ( 64 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 352,43-352
Actquaries Act Section 3(2)(va),72-3(2)(va)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHARMO @ DHARMENDRA SHARMA

    Adv. RAJAT KUMAR SHUKLA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,PANKAJ KUMAR TRIPATHI

  2. 2.SACHIN KUMAR

    Adv. PANKAJ KUMAR TRIPATHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    —

    Rajiv Lochan Shukla

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    —

    Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar (Judicial)View PDF

    The Allahabad High Court adjourned Dharmo @ Dharmendra Sharma's anticipatory bail application (BNSS 482/2026) to March 23, 2026, directing it be heard in the top 20 cases. The court noted the first informant's counsel was absent and ordered that if no representation appears on the next date, the bail application shall be decided in his absence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    —

    Sameer Jain

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NABAIL/1986/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Allahabad High Court adjourned Dharmo @ Dharmendra Sharma's anticipatory bail application (BNSS 482/2026) to March 23, 2026, directing it be heard in the top 20 cases. The court noted the first informant's counsel was absent and ordered that if no representation appears on the next date, the bail application shall be decided in his absence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case