PANKAJ KUMAR vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - G.A. — CRLP/4125/2026

Next hearing: 22nd May 2026.

Next hearing 22-May-2026

CNR: UPHC011067912026

Filing Number

CRLP/

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRLP/4125/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GANGSTER ACT ( 151700 )

Sub-Category

For quashing the FIR ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal WRITS

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PANKAJ KUMAR

    Adv. SHIVAM KUMAR MISHRA,RASHMI UPADHYAY,RASHMI UPADHYAY, ,RASHMI UPADHYAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION - DUDHARA

  3. 3.SRI ARVIND SHARMA (INCHARGE INSPECTOR) P.S. DUDHARA

Case History

  1. 22-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-May-2026

    —

    Tarun Saxena , J.J. Munir

  3. 15-May-2026

    —

    Achal Sachdev , Rajiv Gupta

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Achal Sachdev,rajiv GuptaView PDF

    Case Summary: CRLP 4125/2026 Pankaj Kumar challenged an FIR registered against him under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, arguing it was based solely on one case and was bad in law. The High Court of Allahabad found the matter required consideration and adjourned it to May 15, 2026. Until then, the petitioner was granted interim protection from arrest in connection with the FIR dated January 1, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    —

    Lakshmi Kant Shukla , Rajeev Misra

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/4125/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRLP 4125/2026 Pankaj Kumar challenged an FIR registered against him under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, arguing it was based solely on one case and was bad in law. The High Court of Allahabad found the matter required consideration and adjourned it to May 15, 2026. Until then, the petitioner was granted interim protection from arrest in connection with the FIR dated January 1, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case