MOHD. ISLAM vs STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS Advocate - SUDHIR KUMAR — WRIB/849/2026
Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
CNR: UPHC011046572026
Filing Number
WRIB/
Filing Date
17-Feb-2026
Registration No
WRIB/849/2026
Registration Date
20-Feb-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
THE U.P.Z.A. & L.R. ACT 1950 ( 110100 )
Sub-Category
Order of Board of Revenue ( 61 )
Judicial Branch
Civil WRITS
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MOHD. ISLAM
Adv. UTKARSH SINGH,GAUTAM BAGHEL,GAUTAM BAGHEL, ,GAUTAM BAGHEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS Advocate - SUDHIR KUMAR
-
2.BOARD OF REVENUE UTTAR PRADESH
-
3.SUB DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, TEHSIL KUNDA, DISTRICT PRATAPGARH
-
4.TEHSILDAR, (JUDICIAL) TEHSIL KUNDA, DISTRICT PRATAPGARH
-
5.LAND MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE VILLAGE SUNIYAWA, PARGANA BIHAR, TEHSIL KUNDA, DISTRICT PRATAPGARH
-
6.MAHFOOZ KHAN
-
7.ANISHA
Case History
-
27-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-Apr-2026
—
Arun Kumar
-
20-Apr-2026
—
Kunal Ravi Singh
-
20-Mar-2026
Kunal Ravi SinghView PDF
Case Summary: WRIB/849/2026 Outcome: Case Adjourned with Interim Stay Petitioner Mohd. Islam challenged lower court orders allowing respondents 6 and 7's appeal to record their names in revenue records as successors to his late father. The court found the matter requires consideration and granted interim relief by staying the effect of the appealed orders (dated 02.08.2024 and 08.01.2026). Respondents were given four weeks to file counter-affidavits, with status quo maintained over the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Mar-2026
—
Chandra Kumar Rai
-
13-Mar-2026
—
Dr. Y. K. Srivastava
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2026
Chandra Kumar RaiView PDF
-
17-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WRIB/849/2026
Case Summary: WRIB/849/2026 Outcome: Case Adjourned with Interim Stay Petitioner Mohd. Islam challenged lower court orders allowing respondents 6 and 7's appeal to record their names in revenue records as successors to his late father. The court found the matter requires consideration and granted interim relief by staying the effect of the appealed orders (dated 02.08.2024 and 08.01.2026). Respondents were given four weeks to file counter-affidavits, with status quo maintained over the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts