VIJENDRA AND 4 OTHERS vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NA528/7797/2025
Case under Andhra State Act Section 376(3),43-376(3). Next hearing: 29th July 2026.
CNR: UPHC011002702025
Filing Number
NA528/
Filing Date
28-Feb-2025
Registration No
NA528/7797/2025
Registration Date
05-Mar-2025
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of criminal Proceedings in State case ( 36 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Last updated 27-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIJENDRA AND 4 OTHERS
Adv. PRAVEEN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA,ARVIND KUMAR SAHU,ARVIND KUMAR SAHU, ,ARVIND KUMAR SAHU
-
2.DINESH
Adv. ARVIND KUMAR SAHU
-
3.BIKESH
Adv. ARVIND KUMAR SAHU
-
4.SURJAN
Adv. ARVIND KUMAR SAHU
-
5.SHYAMA DEVI
Adv. ARVIND KUMAR SAHU
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.
-
2.COMPLAINANT/INFORMANT
Case History
-
29-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-Jul-2026
—
Vivek Kumar Singh
-
12-May-2026
Vivek Kumar SinghView PDF
CASE SUMMARY: The Allahabad High Court admitted an application seeking to quash criminal proceedings against Vijendra and 4 others, who were charged with kidnapping, abduction, and sexual assault of a minor under IPC Sections 363, 366, 376(3) and POCSO Act. The applicants argued the FIR was false, claiming the victim left voluntarily, married applicant no. 1 at Allahabad High Court, and made no allegations in her statements. The State's Advocate General opposed, contending the victim's consent is irrelevant as she was a minor. The court issued notice to the first informant, stayed further proceedings against applicants pending receipt of counter-affidavits, and listed the matter for further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-May-2026
—
Vivek Kumar Singh
-
05-May-2026
—
Vivek Kumar Singh
-
28-Apr-2026
—
Vivek Kumar Singh
-
21-Apr-2026
As Fresh
Deepak Verma
-
13-Apr-2026
—
Vivek Kumar Singh
-
24-Mar-2026
Vivek Kumar SinghView PDF
-
24-Mar-2026
—
Tarun Saxena
-
10-Mar-2026
Tarun SaxenaView PDF
-
10-Mar-2026
—
Avnish Saxena
-
17-Feb-2026
Avnish SaxenaView PDF
-
17-Feb-2026
—
Avnish Saxena
-
16-Jan-2026
Avnish SaxenaView PDF
-
16-Jan-2026
—
Avnish Saxena
-
08-Jan-2026
—
Avnish Saxena
-
18-Dec-2025
—
Avnish Saxena
-
11-Dec-2025
—
Avnish Saxena
-
04-Dec-2025
—
Avnish Saxena
-
27-Nov-2025
—
Avnish Saxena
-
20-Nov-2025
—
Avnish Saxena
-
14-Nov-2025
—
Avnish Saxena
-
07-Nov-2025
—
Tej Pratap Tiwari
-
30-Oct-2025
—
Avnish Saxena
-
16-Oct-2025
—
Anish Kumar Gupta
-
09-Oct-2025
—
Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar (Judicial)
-
25-Sep-2025
—
Alok Mathur
-
18-Sep-2025
—
Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar (Judicial)
-
11-Sep-2025
—
Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
-
03-Sep-2025
—
Avnish Saxena
-
27-Aug-2025
—
Manoj Bajaj
-
21-Aug-2025
—
Avnish Saxena
-
13-Aug-2025
—
Dinesh Pathak
-
06-Aug-2025
—
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
-
30-Jul-2025
—
Prashant Kumar
-
23-Jul-2025
—
Prashant Kumar
-
16-Jul-2025
—
Prashant Kumar
-
09-Jul-2025
—
Prashant Kumar
-
02-Jul-2025
—
Vikram D Chauhan
-
25-Jun-2025
—
Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal
-
18-Jun-2025
—
Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar (Judicial)
-
11-Jun-2025
—
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
-
04-Jun-2025
—
Vinod Diwakar
-
28-May-2025
—
Vinod Diwakar
-
21-May-2025
—
Rajeev Misra
-
05-May-2025
—
Rajeev Misra
-
24-Apr-2025
—
Rajeev Misra
-
23-Apr-2025
Rajeev MisraView PDF
-
23-Apr-2025
—
Rajeev Misra
-
09-Apr-2025
Rajeev MisraView PDF
-
09-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. NA528/7797/2025
CASE SUMMARY: The Allahabad High Court admitted an application seeking to quash criminal proceedings against Vijendra and 4 others, who were charged with kidnapping, abduction, and sexual assault of a minor under IPC Sections 363, 366, 376(3) and POCSO Act. The applicants argued the FIR was false, claiming the victim left voluntarily, married applicant no. 1 at Allahabad High Court, and made no allegations in her statements. The State's Advocate General opposed, contending the victim's consent is irrelevant as she was a minor. The court issued notice to the first informant, stayed further proceedings against applicants pending receipt of counter-affidavits, and listed the matter for further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts