RAJ KUMAR vs STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A., ,Sr. Advocate — BAIL/6532/2026
Case under Asian Development Bank Act Section 7,60-7. Disposed: -- on 07th April 2026.
CNR: UPHC010999232026
Filing Number
BAIL/
Filing Date
13-Feb-2026
Registration No
BAIL/6532/2026
Registration Date
18-Feb-2026
Judge
Vikram D Chauhan
Coram
Vikram D Chauhan
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
BAIL MATTERS AGAINST ORDER RELATING TO PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT 1988. ( 50 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJ KUMAR
Adv. UMESH CHANDRA SHUKLA,DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAY,DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAY, ,DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A., ,Sr. Advocate
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
—
Samit Gopal
-
20-Mar-2026
Samit GopalView PDF
In this bail application before the Allahabad High Court, the court granted an adjournment of two weeks on the applicant's request due to his counsel's family illness. The matter was adjourned and listed for fresh hearing on April 7, 2026, with no substantive decision on the bail application itself rendered at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Mar-2026
—
Sameer Jain
-
13-Mar-2026
—
Samit Gopal
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2026
Sameer JainView PDF
-
13-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BAIL/6532/2026
In this bail application before the Allahabad High Court, the court granted an adjournment of two weeks on the applicant's request due to his counsel's family illness. The matter was adjourned and listed for fresh hearing on April 7, 2026, with no substantive decision on the bail application itself rendered at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts