SANJAY PRAKASH RAJVANSHI vs VICE CHANCELLOR, PROF. RAJENDRA SINGH (RAJJU BHAIYA) UNIVERSITY AND 3 OTHERS — WRIC/6916/2026
Disposed: -- on 23rd February 2026.
CNR: UPHC010991322026
Filing Number
WRIC/
Filing Date
13-Feb-2026
Registration No
WRIC/6916/2026
Registration Date
17-Feb-2026
Judge
Piyush Agrawal
Coram
Piyush Agrawal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
DEGREE COLLEGES ( 91500 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 90 )
Judicial Branch
Civil WRITS
Decision Date
23-Feb-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 04-Jul-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANJAY PRAKASH RAJVANSHI
Adv. VIRENDRA KUMAR,MANVENDRA NATH SINGH,MANVENDRA NATH SINGH, ,MANVENDRA NATH SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.VICE CHANCELLOR, PROF. RAJENDRA SINGH (RAJJU BHAIYA) UNIVERSITY AND 3 OTHERS
Adv. ,HARI NARAYAN SINGH 1123
-
2.REGISTRAR, PROF. RAJENDRA SINGH (RAJJU BHAIYA) UNIVERSITY
Adv. HARI NARAYAN SINGH
-
3.EXEMINATION CONTROLLER, PROF. RAJENDRA SINGH (RAJJU BHAIYA) UNIVERSITY
Adv. HARI NARAYAN SINGH
-
4.PRINCIPAL, V.B.S. LAW DEGREE COLLEGE
Adv. HARI NARAYAN SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Feb-2026
—
Piyush Agrawal
-
20-Feb-2026
Piyush AgrawalView PDF
The High Court of Allahabad heard petitioner Sanjay Prakash Rajvanshi's writ petition challenging Prof. Rajendra Singh (Rajju Bhaiya) University's decision regarding his academic eligibility. The court partially heard the case and adjourned it to February 23, 2026, directing the university counsel to explain how the petitioner was permitted to appear in the second semester despite failing to qualify the first semester, and whether back papers were required for all five first-semester subjects or individually. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WRIC/6916/2026
The High Court of Allahabad heard petitioner Sanjay Prakash Rajvanshi's writ petition challenging Prof. Rajendra Singh (Rajju Bhaiya) University's decision regarding his academic eligibility. The court partially heard the case and adjourned it to February 23, 2026, directing the university counsel to explain how the petitioner was permitted to appear in the second semester despite failing to qualify the first semester, and whether back papers were required for all five first-semester subjects or individually. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts