PINKI @ ANJALI DEVI vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NA529/726/2026

Disposed: -- on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC010987472026

Filing Number

NA529/

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

NA529/726/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Judge

Shekhar Kumar Yadav

Coram

Shekhar Kumar Yadav

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION U/S 483 Cr.P.C. ( 401600 )

Sub-Category

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION U/S 483 Cr.P.C. ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PINKI @ ANJALI DEVI

    Adv. SHUBHAM SINGH,PRASHANT SHARMA,PRASHANT SHARMA, ,PRASHANT SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.HONEY @ SITARAM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    Shekhar Kumar YadavView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad disposed of the application by directing the Principal Judge, Family Court, Kanpur Dehat to expeditiously decide the pending case (No. 1284 of 2025) under Section 144 BNSS without granting unnecessary adjournments to either party. The court refrained from expressing any opinion on the merits but emphasized that the decision should be rendered in accordance with law and as expeditiously as possible, barring legal impediments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    —

    Shekhar Kumar Yadav

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    —

    Shekhar Kumar Yadav

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NA529/726/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad disposed of the application by directing the Principal Judge, Family Court, Kanpur Dehat to expeditiously decide the pending case (No. 1284 of 2025) under Section 144 BNSS without granting unnecessary adjournments to either party. The court refrained from expressing any opinion on the merits but emphasized that the decision should be rendered in accordance with law and as expeditiously as possible, barring legal impediments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case