RANI MISHAR vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,ARCHANA DEVI — NA529/725/2026
Disposed: -- on 20th April 2026.
CNR: UPHC010984712026
Filing Number
NA529/
Filing Date
13-Feb-2026
Registration No
NA529/725/2026
Registration Date
16-Feb-2026
Judge
Jai Prakash Tiwari
Coram
Jai Prakash Tiwari
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION U/S 483 Cr.P.C. ( 401600 )
Sub-Category
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION U/S 483 Cr.P.C. ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
20-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RANI MISHAR
Adv. BADRI MANI TRIPATHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,ARCHANA DEVI
-
2.ANSHU SHUKLA
Adv. ARCHANA DEVI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Apr-2026
Jai Prakash TiwariView PDF
The High Court of Allahabad disposed of Rani Mishar's application seeking expedited resolution of her pending Family Court case (Case No. 1139 of 2025 under Section 147 BNSS) against Anshu Shukla, which had been pending since 2025. The court directed the Principal Judge, Family Court, Allahabad to decide the case expeditiously without granting unnecessary adjournments, without expressing any opinion on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Apr-2026
—
Tej Pratap Tiwari
-
10-Apr-2026
—
Vani Ranjan Agrawal
-
03-Apr-2026
—
Jai Prakash Tiwari
-
27-Mar-2026
—
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
-
19-Mar-2026
Shekhar Kumar YadavView PDF
-
19-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Feb-2026
Shekhar Kumar YadavView PDF
-
13-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. NA529/725/2026
The High Court of Allahabad disposed of Rani Mishar's application seeking expedited resolution of her pending Family Court case (Case No. 1139 of 2025 under Section 147 BNSS) against Anshu Shukla, which had been pending since 2025. The court directed the Principal Judge, Family Court, Allahabad to decide the case expeditiously without granting unnecessary adjournments, without expressing any opinion on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts