ISHTIAQ ABDI vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS — WRIB/708/2026

Disposed: -- on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC010977452026

Filing Number

WRIB/

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

WRIB/708/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Judge

Dinesh Pathak

Coram

Dinesh Pathak

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONSOLIDATION OF HOLDINGS ( 100100 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 90 )

Judicial Branch

Civil WRITS

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ISHTIAQ ABDI

    Adv. GIRISH SINGH,ASHISH KUMAR,ASHISH KUMAR, ,ASHISH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

    Adv. ,C.S.C. 1123

  2. 2.CONSOLIDATION OFFICER, HANDIA

    Adv. C.S.C.

  3. 3.DASHRATH

    Adv. C.S.C.

  4. 4.MITHAI LAL

    Adv. C.S.C.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Dinesh PathakView PDF

    The Allahabad High Court disposed of Ishtiaq Abdi's writ petition seeking mandamus to compel the Consolidation Officer, Handia to decide a pending land consolidation case. The court, with the Standing Counsel's consent, directed the Officer to decide the case strictly in accordance with law through a reasoned order, affording parties a hearing and avoiding unnecessary adjournments, within ten months from certified copy production. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    —

    Dinesh Pathak

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    —

    Chandra Kumar Rai

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WRIB/708/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Allahabad High Court disposed of Ishtiaq Abdi's writ petition seeking mandamus to compel the Consolidation Officer, Handia to decide a pending land consolidation case. The court, with the Standing Counsel's consent, directed the Officer to decide the case strictly in accordance with law through a reasoned order, affording parties a hearing and avoiding unnecessary adjournments, within ten months from certified copy production. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case