MANOJ KUMAR vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,SUMIT KAKKAR — CRLA/1867/2026
Case under Actquaries Act Section 3(2)(va),72-3(2)(va). Next hearing: 18th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC010970832026
Filing Number
CRLA/
Filing Date
12-Feb-2026
Registration No
CRLA/1867/2026
Registration Date
16-Feb-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )
Sub-Category
Appeal u/s 14A(1) against any order (Including orders of cancellation of bail), not being an interlocutory order, passed by Exclusive Special Court or Special Court of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities ) Amendment Act, 20 ( 21 )
Judicial Branch
Crl. Appeals
Last updated 04-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANOJ KUMAR
Adv. SHAILESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,SUMIT KAKKAR
-
2.SRI KESHAV GUPTA
Adv. SUMIT KAKKAR
Case History
-
18-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-May-2026
—
Madan Pal Singh
-
11-May-2026
—
Tej Pratap Tiwari
-
04-May-2026
Tej Pratap TiwariView PDF
In Criminal Appeal No. 1867 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court, appellant Manoj Kumar's appeal was called for hearing on May 4, 2026. However, no counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant to press the appeal, while the State of U.P.'s counsel was present. The court adjourned the case and listed it for the next cause list. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
—
Vani Ranjan Agrawal
-
27-Apr-2026
—
Madan Pal Singh
-
20-Apr-2026
—
Madan Pal Singh
-
10-Apr-2026
—
Madan Pal Singh
-
03-Apr-2026
—
Abdul Shahid
-
28-Mar-2026
—
Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)
-
20-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Feb-2026
Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
-
12-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLA/1867/2026
In Criminal Appeal No. 1867 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court, appellant Manoj Kumar's appeal was called for hearing on May 4, 2026. However, no counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant to press the appeal, while the State of U.P.'s counsel was present. The court adjourned the case and listed it for the next cause list. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts