ABHINAV CHAUHAN vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NABAIL/1639/2026

Disposed: -- on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC010969332026

Filing Number

NABAIL/

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

NABAIL/1639/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Judge

Rajiv Lochan Shukla

Coram

Rajiv Lochan Shukla

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

ABAIL MAJOR ( 65 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 03-Jul-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABHINAV CHAUHAN

    Adv. KRISHNA KANT DUBEY,SANTOSH KUMAR DUBEY,SANTOSH KUMAR DUBEY, ,SANTOSH KUMAR DUBEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.SWETA BHARTI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    —

    Rajiv Lochan Shukla

  3. 18-Feb-2026

    Rajiv Lochan ShuklaView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad granted interim anticipatory bail to Abhinav Chauhan in Crime No. 46 of 2025 (Sections 69, 115(2), 351(3) BNS, Wave City PS, Ghaziabad) upon furnishing personal bond and two sureties. The court imposed strict conditions including police interrogation availability, non-interference with witnesses/evidence, prohibition on leaving India without permission, and no witness intimidation. The matter was adjourned to March 9, 2026, with liberty to cancel bail upon breach of conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NABAIL/1639/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad granted interim anticipatory bail to Abhinav Chauhan in Crime No. 46 of 2025 (Sections 69, 115(2), 351(3) BNS, Wave City PS, Ghaziabad) upon furnishing personal bond and two sureties. The court imposed strict conditions including police interrogation availability, non-interference with witnesses/evidence, prohibition on leaving India without permission, and no witness intimidation. The matter was adjourned to March 9, 2026, with liberty to cancel bail upon breach of conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case