MEERA JALAN AND 3 OTHERS vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A. — CRLP/3928/2026

Next hearing: 24th April 2026.

Next hearing 24-Apr-2026

CNR: UPHC010968842026

Filing Number

CRLP/

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRLP/3928/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

QUASHING OF FIR ( 150300 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 90 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal WRITS

Last updated 03-Jul-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MEERA JALAN AND 3 OTHERS

    Adv. DEVAANG SAVLA,TANMAY SADH,TANMAY SADH, ,TANMAY SADH

  2. 2.SURESH AGARWAL

    Adv. TANMAY SADH

  3. 3.RAJ KUMAR SALUJA

    Adv. TANMAY SADH

  4. 4.NAND KISHORE SHARMA

    Adv. TANMAY SADH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

  3. 3.STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION PHASE

  4. 4.SH. VAIBHAV JALAN

Case History

  1. 24-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    —

    Achal Sachdev , Rajiv Gupta

  3. 20-Feb-2026

    Achal Sachdev,rajiv GuptaView PDF

    Case Summary: CRLP No. 3928/2026 The Allahabad High Court referred the dispute between petitioners Meera Jalan and others and respondent State of Uttar Pradesh to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre for settlement. The petitioners must deposit Rs. 50,000 within four weeks (Rs. 45,000 to be paid to respondent no. 4 for expenses), with the mediator given two months to resolve the monetary dispute. Until then, petitioners are granted interim protection from arrest under IPC sections 417, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B; the stay automatically vacates if they default on deposit or fail to participate in mediation. Case listed for April 24, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/3928/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRLP No. 3928/2026 The Allahabad High Court referred the dispute between petitioners Meera Jalan and others and respondent State of Uttar Pradesh to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre for settlement. The petitioners must deposit Rs. 50,000 within four weeks (Rs. 45,000 to be paid to respondent no. 4 for expenses), with the mediator given two months to resolve the monetary dispute. Until then, petitioners are granted interim protection from arrest under IPC sections 417, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B; the stay automatically vacates if they default on deposit or fail to participate in mediation. Case listed for April 24, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case