NEERAJ GOEL vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — CRLA/1869/2026

Case under Actquaries Act Section 3(2)(v),72-3(2)(v). Disposed: -- on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC010965292026

Filing Number

CRLA/

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRLA/1869/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Judge

Shekhar Kumar Yadav

Coram

Shekhar Kumar Yadav

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )

Sub-Category

Appeal under provision of of 14 (A) (2) of SC/ST against Bail orders allowing or rejecting the bail applications by the SC /ST Special Court ( Exclusive Special Courts) (major Bail category) ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

Crl. Appeals

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Actquaries Act Section 3(2)(v),72-3(2)(v)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NEERAJ GOEL

    Adv. AMIT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.SMT. SHOBHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    Shekhar Kumar YadavView PDF

    Case Summary: CRLA 1869/2026 The Allahabad High Court allowed appellant Neeraj Goel's criminal appeal and granted him bail in a case involving charges under SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita sections. The court found that CCTV footage showed the actual perpetrators (co-accused Vipin, Natin, and Rihan) committing the assault, not Goel; a key prosecution witness was declared hostile; and only 2 of 26 chargesheet witnesses had been examined, indicating prolonged trial. Goel was released on personal bond with two sureties and eight strict bail conditions, including non-tampering with evidence and regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    —

    Shekhar Kumar Yadav

  4. 19-Feb-2026

    Shekhar Kumar YadavView PDF

  5. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLA/1869/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRLA 1869/2026 The Allahabad High Court allowed appellant Neeraj Goel's criminal appeal and granted him bail in a case involving charges under SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita sections. The court found that CCTV footage showed the actual perpetrators (co-accused Vipin, Natin, and Rihan) committing the assault, not Goel; a key prosecution witness was declared hostile; and only 2 of 26 chargesheet witnesses had been examined, indicating prolonged trial. Goel was released on personal bond with two sureties and eight strict bail conditions, including non-tampering with evidence and regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case