HARPAL SINGH vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - ADITYA BHUSHAN SINGHAL, ,AKHILESH KUMAR SHARMA — WRIC/6971/2026

Disposed: -- on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC010963942026

Filing Number

WRIC/

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

WRIC/6971/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Judge

Mahesh Chandra Tripathi , Kunal Ravi Singh

Coram

Mahesh Chandra Tripathi , Kunal Ravi Singh

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ( 340700 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 90 )

Judicial Branch

Civil WRITS

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 03-Jul-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARPAL SINGH

    Adv. SUNIL KUMAR PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - ADITYA BHUSHAN SINGHAL, ,AKHILESH KUMAR SHARMA

  2. 2.COLLECTOR / DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

    Adv. AKHILESH KUMAR SHARMA

  3. 3.YAMUNA EXPRESSWAY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

    Adv. AKHILESH KUMAR SHARMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    —

    Mahesh Chandra Tripathi , Kunal Ravi Singh

  3. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,kunal Ravi SinghView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad adjourned the writ petition filed by Harpal Singh against the State of U.P. and others, on the request of counsel for the Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority. The matter was ordered to be listed afresh on February 24, 2026 with updated counsel representation. No substantive order on merits was issued as the hearing was postponed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WRIC/6971/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad adjourned the writ petition filed by Harpal Singh against the State of U.P. and others, on the request of counsel for the Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority. The matter was ordered to be listed afresh on February 24, 2026 with updated counsel representation. No substantive order on merits was issued as the hearing was postponed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case