M/S SS ENTERPRISES THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR, KALU SINGH vs STATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - C.S.C., HARI NARAYAN SINGH,SANJAY KUMAR OM — WRIC/6808/2026

Disposed: -- on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC010944492026

Filing Number

WRIC/

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

WRIC/6808/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Judge

Garima Prashad , Neeraj Tiwari

Coram

Garima Prashad , Neeraj Tiwari

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

NOT COVERED UNDER AFORESAID HEADS ( 229900 )

Judicial Branch

Civil WRITS

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S SS ENTERPRISES THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR, KALU SINGH

    Adv. MUKESH KUMAR,PRIYAVRAT TRIPATHI,PRIYAVRAT TRIPATHI, ,PRIYAVRAT TRIPATHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - C.S.C., HARI NARAYAN SINGH,SANJAY KUMAR OM

  2. 2.MANAGING DIRECTOR, UTTAR PRADESH JAL NIGAM (RURAL)

    Adv. SANJAY KUMAR OM HARI NARAYAN SINGH

  3. 3.CHIEF ENGINEER, MEERUT REGION, UTTAR PRADESH JAL NIGAM (RURAL)

    Adv. SANJAY KUMAR OM HARI NARAYAN SINGH

  4. 4.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, UTTAR PRADESH JAL NIGAM (RURAL)

    Adv. SANJAY KUMAR OM HARI NARAYAN SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Garima Prashad,neeraj TiwariView PDF

    The Allahabad High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by M/S SS Enterprises as infructuous on March 18, 2026, after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the relief sought had already been granted by the respondents. No further orders were required and the case was closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    As Fresh

    Sudhanshu Chauhan , Saral Srivastava

  4. 19-Feb-2026

    Sudhanshu Chauhan,saral SrivastavaView PDF

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WRIC/6808/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Allahabad High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by M/S SS Enterprises as infructuous on March 18, 2026, after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the relief sought had already been granted by the respondents. No further orders were required and the case was closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case