M/S S.S. ENTERPRISES vs STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS Advocate - SANJAY KUMAR OM, HARI NARAYAN SINGH — WRIC/6845/2026
Disposed: -- on 18th March 2026.
CNR: UPHC010944402026
Filing Number
WRIC/
Filing Date
11-Feb-2026
Registration No
WRIC/6845/2026
Registration Date
16-Feb-2026
Judge
Garima Prashad , Neeraj Tiwari
Coram
Garima Prashad , Neeraj Tiwari
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
NOT COVERED UNDER AFORESAID HEADS ( 229900 )
Judicial Branch
Civil WRITS
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S S.S. ENTERPRISES
Adv. MUKESH KUMAR,PRIYAVRAT TRIPATHI,PRIYAVRAT TRIPATHI, ,PRIYAVRAT TRIPATHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS Advocate - SANJAY KUMAR OM, HARI NARAYAN SINGH
-
2.MANAGING DIRECTOR, UTTAR PRADESH JAL NIGAM
Adv. HARI NARAYAN SINGH
-
3.CHIEF ENGINEER, MURADABAD REGION, UTTAR PRADESH JAL NIGAM
Adv. HARI NARAYAN SINGH
-
4.CHIEF ENGINEER (RURAL), UTTAR PRADESH JAL NIGAM
Adv. HARI NARAYAN SINGH
-
5.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, T.C.D. UTTAR PRADESH JAL NIGAM
Adv. HARI NARAYAN SINGH
-
6.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER DISTRICT OFFICER, U.P. JAL NIGAM
Adv. HARI NARAYAN SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Garima Prashad,neeraj TiwariView PDF
The Allahabad High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by M/S S.S. Enterprises against the State of U.P. and others, directing Respondent No. 6 to pay the entire disputed amount to the petitioner within one month from the certified copy production date. The court imposed 6% interest from the due date to actual payment date in case of default, after the respondent's counsel conceded the amount and sought time for payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
As Fresh
Sudhanshu Chauhan , Saral Srivastava
-
19-Feb-2026
Sudhanshu Chauhan,saral SrivastavaView PDF
-
11-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WRIC/6845/2026
The Allahabad High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by M/S S.S. Enterprises against the State of U.P. and others, directing Respondent No. 6 to pay the entire disputed amount to the petitioner within one month from the certified copy production date. The court imposed 6% interest from the due date to actual payment date in case of default, after the respondent's counsel conceded the amount and sought time for payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts