ZAHID ANSARI vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — CRLA/1859/2026

Case under Actquaries Act Section 3(2)(v),72-3(2)(v). Disposed: -- on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC010941012026

Filing Number

CRLA/

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRLA/1859/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Judge

Shekhar Kumar Yadav

Coram

Shekhar Kumar Yadav

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )

Sub-Category

Appeal under provision of of 14 (A) (2) of SC/ST against Bail orders allowing or rejecting the bail applications by the SC /ST Special Court ( Exclusive Special Courts) (Minor Bail category) ( 17 )

Judicial Branch

Crl. Appeals

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Actquaries Act Section 3(2)(v),72-3(2)(v)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ZAHID ANSARI

    Adv. MANVENDRA NARAIN PATHAK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.SRI SANDEEP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    Shekhar Kumar YadavView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad allowed Zahid Ansari's criminal appeal and granted him bail in a case involving allegations of assault with an iron rod under SC/ST Act provisions. The court found that the appellant made out a case for bail considering weak evidence, lack of specific role assignment, no recovered incriminating articles, no charge framed, and a co-accused already granted bail, despite the FIR having a 34-day delay. Ansari was released on personal bond with two sureties subject to stringent conditions including cooperation with prosecution, non-tampering with evidence, and court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    —

    Shekhar Kumar Yadav

  4. 19-Feb-2026

    Shekhar Kumar YadavView PDF

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLA/1859/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad allowed Zahid Ansari's criminal appeal and granted him bail in a case involving allegations of assault with an iron rod under SC/ST Act provisions. The court found that the appellant made out a case for bail considering weak evidence, lack of specific role assignment, no recovered incriminating articles, no charge framed, and a co-accused already granted bail, despite the FIR having a 34-day delay. Ansari was released on personal bond with two sureties subject to stringent conditions including cooperation with prosecution, non-tampering with evidence, and court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case