SURENDRA NATH RAI vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NA528/7690/2026
Case under Andhra State Act Section 504,43-504. Disposed: -- on 07th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC010933442026
Filing Number
NA528/
Filing Date
11-Feb-2026
Registration No
NA528/7690/2026
Registration Date
18-Feb-2026
Judge
Saurabh Srivastava
Coram
Saurabh Srivastava
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of criminal Proceedings in State case ( 36 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 23-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SURENDRA NATH RAI
Adv. JAI RAJ
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.
-
2.A.K. SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Saurabh SrivastavaView PDF
Case Summary: Surendra Nath Rai v. State of U.P. The High Court at Allahabad partly allowed Surendra Nath Rai's petition, setting aside the summoning order dated 10.09.1999 against him for violations under Sections 147, 504, 342, 323, 306 IPC. The court found that the mandatory requirement under Section 197 Cr.P.C.—obtaining prior sanction before prosecuting a government servant for acts performed during official duties—was not complied with before summoning the applicant. The matter was remitted to the lower court to pass a fresh order after proper compliance with Section 197 Cr.P.C. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
—
Saurabh Srivastava
-
29-Apr-2026
Saurabh SrivastavaView PDF
-
29-Apr-2026
—
Chawan Prakash
-
15-Apr-2026
Chawan PrakashView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
—
Saurabh Srivastava
-
06-Apr-2026
Saurabh SrivastavaView PDF
-
06-Apr-2026
—
Saurabh Srivastava
-
30-Mar-2026
—
Saurabh Srivastava
-
23-Mar-2026
—
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
-
16-Mar-2026
—
Devendra Singh-I
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. NA528/7690/2026
Case Summary: Surendra Nath Rai v. State of U.P. The High Court at Allahabad partly allowed Surendra Nath Rai's petition, setting aside the summoning order dated 10.09.1999 against him for violations under Sections 147, 504, 342, 323, 306 IPC. The court found that the mandatory requirement under Section 197 Cr.P.C.—obtaining prior sanction before prosecuting a government servant for acts performed during official duties—was not complied with before summoning the applicant. The matter was remitted to the lower court to pass a fresh order after proper compliance with Section 197 Cr.P.C. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts