GYANENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS — WRIA/8145/2020
Case under Mandamus/act Not Mentioned Section N.A. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC010930962020
Filing Number
WRIA/132921/2020
Filing Date
28-Aug-2020
Registration No
WRIA/8145/2020
Registration Date
01-Oct-2020
Judge
Ajit Kumar
Coram
Ajit Kumar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WRIT PETITIONS RELATING TO STATE GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES (SINGLE BENCH) ( 11500 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 90 )
Judicial Branch
Civil WRITS
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GYANENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Adv. AGNIVESH,JADU NANDAN YADAV,JADU NANDAN YADAV, ,ARIMARDAN YADAV,JADU NANDAN YADAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
-
2.ADDITIOANAL DIRECTOR OF POLICE
-
3.FINANCE CONTROLLER /C.A.O U.P POLICE HEADQUATER
-
4.S.P AURAIYA
Case History
-
25-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
25-May-2026
—
Anish Kumar Gupta
-
16-Mar-2026
—
Anish Kumar Gupta
-
09-Mar-2026
—
Anish Kumar Gupta
-
10-Feb-2026
Anish Kumar GuptaView PDF
The High Court of Allahabad adjourned the writ petition WRIA/8145/2020 filed by Gyanendra Kumar Srivastava against the State of U.P. and others. The court, presiding over by Hon'ble Justice Anish Kumar Gupta, listed the matter for hearing on 09.03.2026 as prayed by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Aug-2025
—
Ajit Kumar
-
09-Apr-2025
—
Ajit Kumar
-
29-Nov-2024
—
Neeraj Tiwari
-
01-Aug-2024
Additional List / Unlisted List
J.J. Munir
-
02-Dec-2023
For Admission
Ajit Kumar
-
28-Nov-2023
For Admission
Ajit Kumar
-
23-Nov-2020
For Admission
Saral Srivastava
-
05-Oct-2020
Saral SrivastavaView PDF
-
05-Oct-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Aug-2020
Case filed
Registration No. WRIA/8145/2020
The High Court of Allahabad adjourned the writ petition WRIA/8145/2020 filed by Gyanendra Kumar Srivastava against the State of U.P. and others. The court, presiding over by Hon'ble Justice Anish Kumar Gupta, listed the matter for hearing on 09.03.2026 as prayed by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts