DEEPAK vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,JAI PRAKASH PRASAD — CRLA/1852/2026

Case under Actquaries Act Section 3(1)s,72-3(1)s. Disposed: -- on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC010900632026

Filing Number

CRLA/

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRLA/1852/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Judge

Shekhar Kumar Yadav

Coram

Shekhar Kumar Yadav

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )

Sub-Category

Appeal under provision of of 14 (A) (2) of SC/ST against Bail orders allowing or rejecting the bail applications by the SC /ST Special Court ( Exclusive Special Courts) (major Bail category) ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

Crl. Appeals

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Actquaries Act Section 3(1)s,72-3(1)s

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEEPAK

    Adv. MUKESH JOSHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,JAI PRAKASH PRASAD

  2. 2.KM. ANAMIKA

    Adv. JAI PRAKASH PRASAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    Shekhar Kumar YadavView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad allowed Deepak's criminal appeal and granted him bail, setting aside the Special Judge's rejection order. The court found that contradictions in the victim's statement, lack of medical evidence supporting the prosecution case, and the victim's prior attempt to withdraw an earlier FIR established sufficient grounds for bail. Deepak was ordered released on personal bond and two sureties, subject to standard bail conditions including non-tampering with evidence and witness intimidation prohibitions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    —

    Shekhar Kumar Yadav

  4. 19-Feb-2026

    Shekhar Kumar YadavView PDF

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLA/1852/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad allowed Deepak's criminal appeal and granted him bail, setting aside the Special Judge's rejection order. The court found that contradictions in the victim's statement, lack of medical evidence supporting the prosecution case, and the victim's prior attempt to withdraw an earlier FIR established sufficient grounds for bail. Deepak was ordered released on personal bond and two sureties, subject to standard bail conditions including non-tampering with evidence and witness intimidation prohibitions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case