MD ARSHAD QURAISHI @ CHOTU vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NA528/6527/2026

Next hearing: 25th May 2026.

Next hearing 25-May-2026

CNR: UPHC010891142026

Filing Number

NA528/

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

NA528/6527/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of criminal Proceedings in State case ( 36 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Last updated 27-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD ARSHAD QURAISHI @ CHOTU

    Adv. NAVEEN SINGH,PIYUSH SINGH,PIYUSH SINGH, ,PIYUSH SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.KRISHNA KUMAR GUPTA

Case History

  1. 25-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-May-2026

    —

    Sanjay Kumar Pachori

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Sanjay Kumar PachoriView PDF

    Case Summary: NA528/6527/2026 MD Arshad Quraishi filed a petition under Section 528 BNSS to quash proceedings under the U.P. Gangsters Act, alleging the FIR was based on false allegations meant to harass him. The High Court of Allahabad found the matter prima facie requires consideration and granted a stay on further proceedings. The court directed the State to file counter-affidavits within three weeks, with rejoinder within one week thereafter, listing the case after eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    —

    Vivek Kumar Singh

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    —

    Vivek Kumar Singh

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    —

    Vivek Kumar Singh

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NA528/6527/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: NA528/6527/2026 MD Arshad Quraishi filed a petition under Section 528 BNSS to quash proceedings under the U.P. Gangsters Act, alleging the FIR was based on false allegations meant to harass him. The High Court of Allahabad found the matter prima facie requires consideration and granted a stay on further proceedings. The court directed the State to file counter-affidavits within three weeks, with rejoinder within one week thereafter, listing the case after eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case