MUKHTAR AHMAD ALIAS BABU AND 2 OTHERS vs SHUBHAM KUMAR AND 5 OTHERS — FAFO/441/2026
Disposed: -- on 03rd April 2026.
CNR: UPHC010889982026
Filing Number
FAFO/
Filing Date
10-Feb-2026
Registration No
FAFO/441/2026
Registration Date
12-Feb-2026
Judge
Piyush Agrawal
Coram
Piyush Agrawal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER ( 302100 )
Sub-Category
U/r 1(r) CPC ( 23 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Appeal
Decision Date
03-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 03-Jul-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MUKHTAR AHMAD ALIAS BABU AND 2 OTHERS
Adv. SUCHITA TRIPATHI,Sr. Advocate,Sr. Advocate, ,Sr. Advocate
-
2.MOHAMMAD AHMED
Adv. Sr. Advocate
-
3.SHER MOHAMMAD
Adv. Sr. Advocate
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHUBHAM KUMAR AND 5 OTHERS
Adv. ,AKASH GARG 1123
-
2.DUSHYANT SINGH RANA
Adv. AKASH GARG
-
3.ISHTIYQ AHMAD
Adv. AKASH GARG
-
4.SMT. SHALU
Adv. AKASH GARG
-
5.MOHD. NAIM
Adv. AKASH GARG
-
6.NOOR ALAM
Adv. AKASH GARG
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
As Fresh
Vikram D Chauhan
-
18-Mar-2026
—
Piyush Agrawal
-
11-Mar-2026
As Fresh
Vikram D Chauhan
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Feb-2026
Piyush AgrawalView PDF
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal, J.) issued an interim order on February 17, 2026, in First Appeal No. 441/2026 between Mukhtar Ahmad Alias Babu and 2 Others (appellants) versus Shubham Kumar and 5 Others (respondents). The court adjourned the case for fresh listing on February 25, 2026, without delivering a substantive judgment on the merits of the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. FAFO/441/2026
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal, J.) issued an interim order on February 17, 2026, in First Appeal No. 441/2026 between Mukhtar Ahmad Alias Babu and 2 Others (appellants) versus Shubham Kumar and 5 Others (respondents). The court adjourned the case for fresh listing on February 25, 2026, without delivering a substantive judgment on the merits of the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts