SMT. MAUNISHA AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A. — CRLP/3495/2026

Next hearing: 07th April 2026.

Next hearing 07-Apr-2026

CNR: UPHC010883772026

Filing Number

CRLP/

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRLP/3495/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

QUASHING OF FIR ( 150300 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 90 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal WRITS

Last updated 03-Jul-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. MAUNISHA AND ANOTHER

    Adv. RIZWAN AHMAD,MD FAIZ SIDDIQUI,MD FAIZ SIDDIQUI, ,MO ADNAN,MD FAIZ SIDDIQUI

  2. 2.AKIL ALIAS ANKIT

    Adv. MD FAIZ SIDDIQUI MO ADNAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.SUPERITENDANT OF POLICE

  3. 3.STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION MAJHAULA

  4. 4.MOHAMMAD SHAUKIN

Case History

  1. 07-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    —

    Tarun Saxena , J.J. Munir

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  4. 16-Feb-2026

    Tarun Saxena,ajay BhanotView PDF

    Case Summary: CRLP/3495/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad issued an interim order on a petition by Smt. Maunisha and another challenging an FIR registered against them. The petitioners, who are married adults, argued the FIR was filed due to familial opposition and malafides. The court stayed arrest pending further proceedings, directed respondent no. 4 to be served notice, and ordered the government to file a counter-affidavit within four weeks. The petitioners must cooperate in police investigation; the case is listed for further consideration before an appropriate bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/3495/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRLP/3495/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad issued an interim order on a petition by Smt. Maunisha and another challenging an FIR registered against them. The petitioners, who are married adults, argued the FIR was filed due to familial opposition and malafides. The court stayed arrest pending further proceedings, directed respondent no. 4 to be served notice, and ordered the government to file a counter-affidavit within four weeks. The petitioners must cooperate in police investigation; the case is listed for further consideration before an appropriate bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case