NASEEM vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NABAIL/1481/2026

Case under Apprentices Act Section 21,48-21. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.

Next hearing 01-Jun-2026

CNR: UPHC010873672026

Filing Number

NABAIL/

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

NABAIL/1481/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

ABAIL MINOR ( 64 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Apprentices Act Section 21,48-21

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NASEEM

    Adv. CH. DIL NISAR,ANKIT SRIVASTAVA,ANKIT SRIVASTAVA, ,ANKIT SRIVASTAVA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.S.I ATUL KUMAR

Case History

  1. 01-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    —

    Jai Prakash Tiwari

  3. 22-May-2026

    —

    Rajiv Lochan Shukla

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Rajiv Lochan ShuklaView PDF

    In Naseem's anticipatory bail application before the Allahabad High Court (NABAIL/1481/2026), the case was adjourned to be heard afresh on 22.5.2026 before an appropriate bench. The previously granted interim order was extended until the next date of listing, and the matter was clarified as not being tied up or part-heard to the current bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 27-Apr-2026

    —

    Rajiv Lochan Shukla

  6. 20-Apr-2026

    —

    Rajiv Lochan Shukla

  7. 10-Apr-2026

    —

    Sameer Jain

  8. 03-Apr-2026

    —

    Rajiv Lochan Shukla

  9. 27-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 13-Feb-2026

    Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar (Judicial)View PDF

  11. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NABAIL/1481/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In Naseem's anticipatory bail application before the Allahabad High Court (NABAIL/1481/2026), the case was adjourned to be heard afresh on 22.5.2026 before an appropriate bench. The previously granted interim order was extended until the next date of listing, and the matter was clarified as not being tied up or part-heard to the current bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case