CHANDRAMANI SINGH vs STATE OF UP AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NA528/7688/2026
Case under Andhra State Act Section 409,43-409. Disposed: -- on 21st April 2026.
CNR: UPHC010867242026
Filing Number
NA528/
Filing Date
09-Feb-2026
Registration No
NA528/7688/2026
Registration Date
18-Feb-2026
Judge
Saurabh Srivastava
Coram
Saurabh Srivastava
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of charge sheet ( 27 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
21-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 23-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHANDRAMANI SINGH
Adv. NITIN SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UP AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.
-
2.NARESH KUMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Apr-2026
—
Saurabh Srivastava
-
06-Apr-2026
Saurabh SrivastavaView PDF
In this Allahabad High Court application, petitioner Chandramani Singh challenged an alleged excess scholarship payment against the State of U.P. The court granted the state's advocate ten days to obtain instructions regarding whether Singh was informed he was entitled only to Rs. 63,900 after meeting eligibility criteria for scholarship extension. The matter was adjourned for fresh hearing on April 21, 2026, pending clarification on the excess payment issue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
—
Saurabh Srivastava
-
30-Mar-2026
—
Saurabh Srivastava
-
23-Mar-2026
—
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
-
16-Mar-2026
—
Devendra Singh-I
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. NA528/7688/2026
In this Allahabad High Court application, petitioner Chandramani Singh challenged an alleged excess scholarship payment against the State of U.P. The court granted the state's advocate ten days to obtain instructions regarding whether Singh was informed he was entitled only to Rs. 63,900 after meeting eligibility criteria for scholarship extension. The matter was adjourned for fresh hearing on April 21, 2026, pending clarification on the excess payment issue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts