VISHAL SINGH @ LOHA SINGH vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A. — NA528/6335/2026

Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

Next hearing 16-Jun-2026

CNR: UPHC010862622026

Filing Number

NA528/

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

NA528/6335/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of charge sheet ( 27 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VISHAL SINGH @ LOHA SINGH

    Adv. HARI NATH CHAUBEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.INFORMANT

  3. 3.HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE

  4. 4.CHILD WELFARE COMMITTEE

Case History

  1. 16-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Sanjay Kumar Pachori

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Sanjay Kumar PachoriView PDF

    Case Summary: Vishal Singh filed a petition under Section 528 BNSS to quash criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 1735 of 2025) involving allegations under BNS Sections 75, 333, 351(2), 352, and POCSO Act Section 7/8. Applicant contended the FIR was based on false allegations and a property dispute over pillar construction between family members. The High Court of Allahabad found the matter prima facie requires consideration and granted interim stay of further proceedings against the applicant. Notice issued to opposite parties; counter-affidavits due within two weeks. Case listed after eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Sanjay Kumar Pachori

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Sanjay Kumar PachoriView PDF

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Vivek Kumar Singh

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Vivek Kumar Singh

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    Vivek Kumar Singh

  9. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NA528/6335/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Vishal Singh filed a petition under Section 528 BNSS to quash criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 1735 of 2025) involving allegations under BNS Sections 75, 333, 351(2), 352, and POCSO Act Section 7/8. Applicant contended the FIR was based on false allegations and a property dispute over pillar construction between family members. The High Court of Allahabad found the matter prima facie requires consideration and granted interim stay of further proceedings against the applicant. Notice issued to opposite parties; counter-affidavits due within two weeks. Case listed after eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case