VISHAL SINGH @ LOHA SINGH vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A. — NA528/6335/2026
Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
CNR: UPHC010862622026
Filing Number
NA528/
Filing Date
09-Feb-2026
Registration No
NA528/6335/2026
Registration Date
10-Feb-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of charge sheet ( 27 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Last updated 23-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VISHAL SINGH @ LOHA SINGH
Adv. HARI NATH CHAUBEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A.
-
2.INFORMANT
-
3.HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
-
4.CHILD WELFARE COMMITTEE
Case History
-
16-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Jun-2026
—
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
-
10-Apr-2026
Sanjay Kumar PachoriView PDF
Case Summary: Vishal Singh filed a petition under Section 528 BNSS to quash criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 1735 of 2025) involving allegations under BNS Sections 75, 333, 351(2), 352, and POCSO Act Section 7/8. Applicant contended the FIR was based on false allegations and a property dispute over pillar construction between family members. The High Court of Allahabad found the matter prima facie requires consideration and granted interim stay of further proceedings against the applicant. Notice issued to opposite parties; counter-affidavits due within two weeks. Case listed after eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
—
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
-
23-Mar-2026
Sanjay Kumar PachoriView PDF
-
23-Mar-2026
—
Vivek Kumar Singh
-
16-Mar-2026
—
Vivek Kumar Singh
-
09-Mar-2026
—
Vivek Kumar Singh
-
23-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. NA528/6335/2026
Case Summary: Vishal Singh filed a petition under Section 528 BNSS to quash criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 1735 of 2025) involving allegations under BNS Sections 75, 333, 351(2), 352, and POCSO Act Section 7/8. Applicant contended the FIR was based on false allegations and a property dispute over pillar construction between family members. The High Court of Allahabad found the matter prima facie requires consideration and granted interim stay of further proceedings against the applicant. Notice issued to opposite parties; counter-affidavits due within two weeks. Case listed after eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts