HEMESH vs STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A., SUSHIL KUMAR PANDEY, SUSHIL KUMAR PANDEY — BAIL/5353/2026
Disposed: -- on 23rd February 2026.
CNR: UPHC010862492026
Filing Number
BAIL/
Filing Date
09-Feb-2026
Registration No
BAIL/5353/2026
Registration Date
10-Feb-2026
Judge
Vivek Varma
Coram
Vivek Varma
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 439 Cr.P.C. for bail (major) ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
23-Feb-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HEMESH
Adv. ABHISHEK TIWARI,MAHESH KUMAR,MAHESH KUMAR, ,MAHESH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A., SUSHIL KUMAR PANDEY, SUSHIL KUMAR PANDEY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Feb-2026
As Fresh
Vivek Varma
-
13-Feb-2026
Vivek VarmaView PDF
The High Court of Allahabad admitted advocate Shushil Kumar Pandey's vakalatnama on behalf of the informant. As the Government Advocate stated he had not received instructions, the court adjourned the bail application as fresh to February 23, 2026, with Pandey noted as counsel for the informant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BAIL/5353/2026
The High Court of Allahabad admitted advocate Shushil Kumar Pandey's vakalatnama on behalf of the informant. As the Government Advocate stated he had not received instructions, the court adjourned the bail application as fresh to February 23, 2026, with Pandey noted as counsel for the informant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts