FAIZAN HUSSAIN vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,MOHAMMAD AON — NA528/6326/2026

Case under Andhra State Act Section 506,43-506. Disposed: -- on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC010857322026

Filing Number

NA528/

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

NA528/6326/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Judge

Saurabh Srivastava

Coram

Saurabh Srivastava

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of charge sheet ( 27 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 506,43-506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.FAIZAN HUSSAIN

    Adv. PREM SAGAR VERMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,MOHAMMAD AON

  2. 2.TUBA KHATOON

    Adv. MOHAMMAD AON

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    —

    Saurabh Srivastava

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Saurabh SrivastavaView PDF

    The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad directed the office to obtain a report on service of notice through the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bareilly, as the notice had not yet been served on the respondents. The case was adjourned for fresh hearing on April 21, 2026, to allow completion of proper service proceedings before substantive consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    —

    Saurabh Srivastava

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Saurabh SrivastavaView PDF

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    —

    Sanjay Kumar Pachori

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    —

    Devendra Singh-I

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    —

    Sanjay Kumar Pachori

  9. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NA528/6326/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad directed the office to obtain a report on service of notice through the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bareilly, as the notice had not yet been served on the respondents. The case was adjourned for fresh hearing on April 21, 2026, to allow completion of proper service proceedings before substantive consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case