SONU vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,MAHENDRA PAL SINGH GAUR — BAIL/5424/2026

Disposed: -- on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 16-Feb-2026

CNR: UPHC010856402026

Filing Number

BAIL/

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

BAIL/5424/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Judge

Dr. Gautam Chowdhary

Coram

Dr. Gautam Chowdhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/s 439 Cr.P.C. for bail (major) ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SONU

    Adv. LAVESH SHARMA,RAVINDRA SHARMA,RAVINDRA SHARMA, ,RAVINDRA SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,MAHENDRA PAL SINGH GAUR

  2. 2.INFORMANT

    Adv. MAHENDRA PAL SINGH GAUR

  3. 3.HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICE COMMITTEE

    Adv. MAHENDRA PAL SINGH GAUR

  4. 4.CHILD WELFARE COMMITTEE

    Adv. MAHENDRA PAL SINGH GAUR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Dr. Gautam ChowdharyView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad granted bail to applicant Sonu, who was charged under BNS sections 137(2), 351(2), 65(1) and POCSO Act sections 3/4. The court found that the alleged victim's statement indicated consensual relations rather than coercion, and observed no substantial contradictory evidence or risk of tampering. Sonu was released on personal bond with two local sureties, subject to conditions including non-interference with prosecution evidence/witnesses, regular court attendance, and prohibition from criminal activity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    —

    Dr. Gautam Chowdhary

  4. 16-Feb-2026

    Dr. Gautam ChowdharyView PDF

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BAIL/5424/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad granted bail to applicant Sonu, who was charged under BNS sections 137(2), 351(2), 65(1) and POCSO Act sections 3/4. The court found that the alleged victim's statement indicated consensual relations rather than coercion, and observed no substantial contradictory evidence or risk of tampering. Sonu was released on personal bond with two local sureties, subject to conditions including non-interference with prosecution evidence/witnesses, regular court attendance, and prohibition from criminal activity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case